Case Report
Volume: 3 | Issue: 2 | Published: Apr 25, 2019 | Pages: 68 - 73 | DOI: 10.24911/ejmcr/173-1542301068
Next-generation DNA sequencing in an appropriate sex assignment: Case report of two phenotypically similar patients with 46, XY disorder of sex development.
Authors: Irina L Nikitina , Elena K Kudryashova , Ruslan R Batrutdinov , Anna A Kostareva , Igor A. Kelmanson , Elena N. Grineva
Article Info
Authors
Irina L Nikitina
Department of Children's Diseases, Institute for Medical Education of the V.A.Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Russia
Elena K Kudryashova
Pediatric Endocrinology Laboratory, Institute of Pediatric Endocrinology of the V.A. Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Russia
Ruslan R Batrutdinov
Department of Pediatric Surgery of the I.I.Mechnikov North-West State Medical University, Russia
Anna A Kostareva
Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics of the V.A.Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Russia
Igor A. Kelmanson
Department of Childrens Diseases, Institute for Medical Education of the V.A.Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Russia
Elena N. Grineva
Institute of Endocrinology of the V.A. Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Russia
Publication History
Received: November 17, 2018
Revised: March 08, 2019
Accepted: March 20, 2019
Published: April 25, 2019
Abstract
Background. Disorders of sex development (DSD) are known as the inborn atypical development of chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomic sex. New opportunities in counseling DSD patients have emerged with an advent of the next generation DNA sequencing (NGS) techniques. Case presentation. Two clinical 46, XY DSD cases having similar phenotypical features, including ambiguous genitalia, are presented in this paper. In the first patient, no causative variant was found, meanwhile, a heterozygous variant in the CHD 7 gene considered as likely-benign was identified (chr8:61693942, rs377139749, NM_017780.3:c.2053_2058dupGCAAAA p.Lys686_Thr687insAlaLys). Neither gonadal ability to produce androgens, nor tissue androgen sensitivity was impaired, therefore leading to a decision to maintain the initially assigned male sex in this patient. In the other patient, the study revealed previously reported heterozygous missense variant in the SEMA3A gene (chr7:83636785, rs769957117, NM_006080.2:c.А1024G:p.Met342Val) responsible for HH type 16 (OMIM 614897). As well, a novel hemizygous variant in the AR gene (chrX:66942818, AR:NM_000044:c.G2599C:p.Val867Leu) was identified. In conjunction with the features of HH, this leads to a decision to reassign the sex of rearing to a female. Conclusion. NGS technique may be helpful in optimal sex assignment in DSD cases.
Keywords: case report, disorders of sex development, next-generation sequencing, genes, genital ambiguity, gene variants, green